Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan 13/08/2019 – Posted in: Daily News – Tags: Centre for Science and Environment, DISCOM
PRADHAN MANTRI KISAN URJA SURAKSHA EVAM UTTHAAN MAHABHIYAN
For: Preliminary & Mains
Topics covered: About the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan, Findings of Centre for Science and Environment
News Flash
According to a report from Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a Delhi-based non-profit,
- The centre’s new Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan (PM-Kusum) scheme is not a solution for India’s irrigation needs.
- The scheme might result in the over-exploitation of groundwater and won’t help reduce discoms’ subsidy burden.
Background
- The scheme was approved in February 2019.
- It expects to install 17.5 lakh off-grid and 10 lakh on-grid solar pumps and 10 gigawatts of solar power plants capacity in rural areas by 2022.
- It also targets to increase farmer income through the sale of surplus power, reduce electricity subsidy burden and expand the distributed renewable energy capacity.
Key findings of CSE
- The scheme might result in the over-exploitation of groundwater.
- The findings are based on its surveys of farmers in three districts in Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh.
- In regions with water-scarcity, the solar pumps are unable to provide adequate irrigation due to depleting groundwater.
- PM-Kusum may also not help reduce discoms’ subsidy burden because the installation of pumps is not mandatorily tied to a decrease in subsidised agricultural power supply.
- Although PM-Kusum aims to reduce subsidy burden of state discoms, it does not have any clear goals or provisions to ensure subsidy reduction.
- The subsidised solar pumps are being installed without accompanying cuts in agricultural supply or a reduction in subsidy.
- The risk of over-extraction of groundwater is most by off-grid pumps and they also remain underused.
- The utilisation of pumps was as low as 33 percent, according to a survey of farmers in Buldhana, Maharashtra.
- The solarisation of agricultural feeders and on-grid solar pumps are economically superior to off-grid pumps. It is because excess electricity can be injected into the grid.
- While, the solarisation of agricultural feeders and on-grid solar pumps are economically superior to off-grid pumps, as excess electricity can be injected into the grid, they do not specify measures to limit water use.
- PM-Kusum’s proposed scheme of installing solar plants on farmland will benefit only the wealthy farmers, as it requires a large investment or the ability to lease land for 25 years.
Way ahead
- The solar pump programme certainly needs a relook.
- PM-Kusum needs reforms in agricultural support price, rationalisation of power tariff, direct benefit transfer and water-efficient irrigation.
Source: Down To Earth
Also, read more daily News
- New GDP series to align with Global Method
- Lake “Kajin Sara”
- Reusable Rockets
- Henley Passport Index 2019
- Dr. Vikaram Sarabhai
You are on the Best Online IAS preparation platform. You are learning under experts.
We are present on Facebook- Diligent IAS, LinkedIn- Diligent IAS, YouTube- Diligent IAS, Instagram- Diligent IAS. Get in touch with us